Consumer law — Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act — Wireless service carrier — Administrative fees — Motion to dismiss is denied — Documents and website referenced in motion to dismiss cannot be considered in ruling on motion where authenticity cannot be verified — Complaint alleging that wireless service carrier charged administrative fee that was not used to defray expenses carrier pays to third parties associated with providing wireless service but, rather, to charge more for service without advertising higher price states cause of action for FDUTPA violation for damages, declaratory relief, and unjust enrichment — Carrier’s claim of preemption by Federal Communications Act fails as matter of law on motion to dismiss
Legal Topics
Consumer law — Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act — Wireless service carrier
Sep 17th, 2024 in by admin