Criminal law — Driving under influence — Discovery — Intoxilyzer eeproms or chips — Motion for production of eeproms and chips from Intoxilyzer used to test defendant’s breath is denied — Items are excluded from “full information” that must be made available to defendant under section 316.1932(1)(f)(4) — Items are owned and possessed by manufacturer, not state, and defendant has not shown materiality of items
Legal Topics
Criminal law — Driving under influence — Discovery — Intoxilyzer eeproms or chips
May 24th, 2024 in by admin