Criminal law — Driving under influence — Discovery — Third party — Intoxilyzer manufacturer — Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum requiring Intoxilyzer manufacturer to produce various documents regarding machine is denied — Items are excluded from “full information” that must be made available to defendant under section 316.1932(1)(f)(4) — Statute expressly excludes items in manufacturer’s possession from being discoverable, and defendant has not shown materiality of items
Legal Topics
Criminal law — Driving under influence — Discovery — Third party — Intoxilyzer manufacturer
May 28th, 2024 in by admin