Legal Topics

NO ERROR IN FINDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT WAS NOT A MEDICAL EXPERT QUALIFIED UNDER SECTION 766.102(5) AND 766.202(6) — PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED MEDICAL EXPERT WAS NOT ENGAGED IN THE PRACTICE OF MEDICINE NOR WAS HE A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER AS REQUIRED BY LAW

Feb 07th, 2025 in by admin

NO ERROR IN FINDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT WAS NOT A MEDICAL EXPERT QUALIFIED UNDER SECTION 766.102(5) AND 766.202(6) — PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED MEDICAL EXPERT WAS NOT ENGAGED IN THE PRACTICE OF MEDICINE NOR WAS HE A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER AS REQUIRED…


[ Click To Read The Rest ]

TRIAL COURT ERRED IN INVALIDATING THE DRIVER’S PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT BECAUSE IT DID NOT ADDRESS WHETHER THE OFFER INCLUDED SETOFFS—FEE ENTITLEMENT DEPENDS ON THE NET JUDGMENT AFTER SETOFFS AND TO MAKE THE OFFEROR REFERENCE ULTIMATE SETOFFS IS UNNECESSARY AND CREATES A RISK OF CONFUSION

Feb 04th, 2025 in by admin

TRIAL COURT ERRED IN INVALIDATING THE DRIVER’S PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT BECAUSE IT DID NOT ADDRESS WHETHER THE OFFER INCLUDED SETOFFS—FEE ENTITLEMENT DEPENDS ON THE NET JUDGMENT AFTER SETOFFS AND TO MAKE THE OFFEROR REFERENCE ULTIMATE SETOFFS IS UNNECESSARY AND CREATES…


[ Click To Read The Rest ]