TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN DENYING MOTION FOR 57.105 SANCTIONS--THERE IS NO EXCEPTION FOR AN ATTORNEY WHO FEARS DROPPING A CLAIM WHICH THE ATTORNEY COMES TO UNDERSTAND IS NOT LEGALLY SUPPORTED, SIMPLY BECAUSE THE ATTORNEY HAS NOT HAD AN…

A COURT SHOULD HOLD AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING TO ADDRESS DISPUTED ISSUES OF FACT CONCERNING WHETHER PLAINTIFF RECEIVED NOTICE OF AN IMPENDING DISMISSAL--NO RELIEF UNDER RULE 1.540(a) BECAUSE OF THE CLERK’S ALLEGED FAILURE TO MAIL NOTICE OF LACK OF PROSECUTION, BECAUSE…